DSS Check-in
DSS Check-in — Recording
Executive Summary
## Summary ### Immediate Bill Payment Processing Challenges The team faces urgent pressure to resolve bill payment processing errors by the next day to prevent customer impact, particularly for end-of-month payments. Approximately 11,000 errors are backlogged, with new errors accumulating weekly, creating a "needle in a haystack" scenario for identifying critical issues. While not all errors are critical (e.g., some are flagged as DSS-related but non-critical), the volume obscures high-priority fixes. The immediate goal is to reduce error counts to enable transparent customer communication about progress and mitigate reputational damage from delayed resolutions. ### DSS System Issues and Access Constraints Upstream data ingestion via the DSS system is identified as a recurring source of errors, requiring urgent attention to prevent future bottlenecks. Key challenges include: - **Output service code access**: Critical troubleshooting is hindered because the codebase resides solely on Matthew’s local machine, with no team access. Matthew’s unavailability until Monday delays resolution, forcing workarounds. - **Error origin ambiguity**: Discrepancies exist over whether errors stem from DSS formatting, the output service, or UBM processing. Examples of "yellow-flagged" DSS errors need analysis to determine if they require upstream fixes or UBM workflow adjustments. - **Long-term solution dependency**: Resolving core issues may require integrating DSS fixes with UBM changes, but UBM’s complex codebase and slow iteration cycles (e.g., changes taking weeks) complicate coordination. ### Reporting and Visibility Gaps A lack of real-time, consolidated reporting exacerbates response delays and misalignment. Critical developments include: - **New Power BI dashboard**: A pre-production report is being developed to unify bill IDs, customers, and error statuses-addressing the absence of a single source of truth. This aims to replace fragmented Excel exports and accelerate decision-making. - **Interim Appsmith solution**: A read-only UI connected to the UBM database allows ad-hoc querying and exports, reducing dependency on dev teams for data pulls. - **Report consolidation initiative**: Over 40 existing Power BI reports will be cataloged in a living document, with plans to sunset redundant or one-off reports (e.g., those used less than biannually) to streamline focus. ### Team Coordination and Process Improvements Operational inefficiencies require structural changes to handle recurring crises: - **Recurring check-ins**: Biweekly (Tuesday/Thursday) syncs will be established for core members (e.g., Faisal, Jay, Tim) to monitor error resolution and prioritize tasks without leadership overhead. - **Expedited issue handling**: A dedicated triage team or SLA-driven process for P0/P1 issues will be explored to prevent urgent fixes from stalling in sprint backlogs. - **Communication channels**: Transitioning from Teams messages to threaded channels (e.g., "DS Ops and Product") improves issue tracking and reduces context-switching. ### UBM Team Workload and Prioritization The UBM team’s capacity constraints and process rigidity delay critical fixes: - **Workload imbalance**: Customer onboarding and data repairs consume significant resources, leaving minimal bandwidth for error resolution. A proposed triage team could handle exports/imports separately. - **Prioritization inertia**: The team’s adherence to legacy workflows (e.g., manual Excel handling) conflicts with urgent needs. Restructuring work "buckets" (e.g., feature development vs. expedites) and setting clear SLAs are proposed solutions. - **Mindset shift**: Encouraging the team to challenge "how it’s always been done" (e.g., fixing upstream issues in DSS instead of UBM) is essential for long-term efficiency. ### DSS Team Expansion and Integration Three new India-based developers will join to bolster DSS capabilities, focusing on: - **Backend support**: Assisting Shake with error resolution and backlog management, leveraging their UBM database experience. - **UBM integration**: Training on DSS semantics and UBM workflows to facilitate cross-system troubleshooting and reduce silos. - **Sunsetting DSS**: Long-term plans include phasing out DSS by migrating its functions to UBM (targeting H1 2025) to eliminate redundancy and simplify architecture. ### Knowledge Sharing and Documentation Bridging knowledge gaps is critical for sustained progress: - **UBM training for DSS team**: Shake and new members will learn UBM’s data model and error codes to diagnose issues faster, using real examples from recent reports. - **DSS schema documentation**: Creating a reference for UBM-related DSS workflows to clarify handoff points and dependencies. - **Error code analysis**: Collaborating with Jay to categorize errors (e.g., DSS vs. output service vs. UBM) and build a remediation roadmap for October.
The team faces urgent pressure to resolve bill payment processing errors by the next day to prevent customer impact, particularly for end-of-month payments. Approximately 11,000 errors are backlogged, with new errors accumulating weekly, creating a "needle in a haystack" scenario for identifying critical issues. While not all errors are critical (e.g., some are flagged as DSS-related but non-critical), the volume obscures high-priority fixes. The immediate goal is to reduce error counts to enable transparent customer communication about progress and mitigate reputational damage from delayed resolutions.
DSS System Issues and Access Constraints
Upstream data ingestion via the DSS system is identified as a recurring source of errors, requiring urgent attention to prevent future bottlenecks. Key challenges include:
Output service code access: Critical troubleshooting is hindered because the codebase resides solely on Matthew’s local machine, with no team access. Matthew’s unavailability until Monday delays resolution, forcing workarounds.
Error origin ambiguity: Discrepancies exist over whether errors stem from DSS formatting, the output service, or UBM processing. Examples of "yellow-flagged" DSS errors need analysis to determine if they require upstream fixes or UBM workflow adjustments.
Long-term solution dependency: Resolving core issues may require integrating DSS fixes with UBM changes, but UBM’s complex codebase and slow iteration cycles (e.g., changes taking weeks) complicate coordination.
Reporting and Visibility Gaps
A lack of real-time, consolidated reporting exacerbates response delays and misalignment. Critical developments include:
New Power BI dashboard: A pre-production report is being developed to unify bill IDs, customers, and error statuses-addressing the absence of a single source of truth. This aims to replace fragmented Excel exports and accelerate decision-making.
Interim Appsmith solution: A read-only UI connected to the UBM database allows ad-hoc querying and exports, reducing dependency on dev teams for data pulls.
Report consolidation initiative: Over 40 existing Power BI reports will be cataloged in a living document, with plans to sunset redundant or one-off reports (e.g., those used less than biannually) to streamline focus.
Team Coordination and Process Improvements
Operational inefficiencies require structural changes to handle recurring crises:
Recurring check-ins: Biweekly (Tuesday/Thursday) syncs will be established for core members (e.g., Faisal, Jay, Tim) to monitor error resolution and prioritize tasks without leadership overhead.
Expedited issue handling: A dedicated triage team or SLA-driven process for P0/P1 issues will be explored to prevent urgent fixes from stalling in sprint backlogs.
Communication channels: Transitioning from Teams messages to threaded channels (e.g., "DS Ops and Product") improves issue tracking and reduces context-switching.
UBM Team Workload and Prioritization
The UBM team’s capacity constraints and process rigidity delay critical fixes:
Workload imbalance: Customer onboarding and data repairs consume significant resources, leaving minimal bandwidth for error resolution. A proposed triage team could handle exports/imports separately.
Prioritization inertia: The team’s adherence to legacy workflows (e.g., manual Excel handling) conflicts with urgent needs. Restructuring work "buckets" (e.g., feature development vs. expedites) and setting clear SLAs are proposed solutions.
Mindset shift: Encouraging the team to challenge "how it’s always been done" (e.g., fixing upstream issues in DSS instead of UBM) is essential for long-term efficiency.
DSS Team Expansion and Integration
Three new India-based developers will join to bolster DSS capabilities, focusing on:
Backend support: Assisting Shake with error resolution and backlog management, leveraging their UBM database experience.
UBM integration: Training on DSS semantics and UBM workflows to facilitate cross-system troubleshooting and reduce silos.
Sunsetting DSS: Long-term plans include phasing out DSS by migrating its functions to UBM (targeting H1 2025) to eliminate redundancy and simplify architecture.
Knowledge Sharing and Documentation
Bridging knowledge gaps is critical for sustained progress:
UBM training for DSS team: Shake and new members will learn UBM’s data model and error codes to diagnose issues faster, using real examples from recent reports.
DSS schema documentation: Creating a reference for UBM-related DSS workflows to clarify handoff points and dependencies.
Error code analysis: Collaborating with Jay to categorize errors (e.g., DSS vs. output service vs. UBM) and build a remediation roadmap for October.
Key Topics
Decisions
No decisions recorded
Action Items(0/0 done)
No action items recorded